Technically assess every candidate
in minutes, not hours
Real code challenges. Assessed, scored, and recommended — against your brief.
Get early access. No card required.
Manual code review doesn't scale
You already know the problem. Here's what it costs.
A senior developer spends half a day reviewing one tech test. That time comes straight from your sprint capacity.
Inconsistent reviewers, subjective scoring, and time pressure mean strong developers are filtered out before you see them.
Waiting for busy engineers to review submissions creates bottlenecks that drag out your hiring pipeline.
How it works
Four steps from role requirements to ranked, scored candidates.
Define the role
Describe the position and skills. Get a tailored code challenge with clear, measurable requirements.
Invite candidates
Share a unique link. Candidates connect GitHub and submit their repository in their own time.
Get scored results
Each submission is analysed against your brief across nine dimensions with detailed scoring.
Make the call
Review ranked candidates with strengths, concerns, and follow-up questions for interviews.
What changes when you stop guessing
Compare candidates on evidence, not gut feel
Every submission scored on the same nine dimensions — code quality, architecture, testing, brief compliance, and more. You see exactly how each candidate stacks up, with reasoning behind every score.
Reclaim your engineers’ time
The three-hour code review happens in minutes. Your senior developers stay focused on shipping, not reading through repos they don't have time to properly assess.
Give every candidate a fair process
Consistent criteria, applied the same way to every submission. No bias from who reviewed when, no advantage for candidates who are better at talking than coding. Everyone gets specific feedback on their work.
Common questions
How does the scoring work?
Each submission is analysed against your brief requirements across nine dimensions — code quality, architecture, testing, documentation, brief compliance, and more. Every score comes with specific reasoning and code references.
What languages and frameworks are supported?
Any language, any framework. Candidates submit a real GitHub repository, so the analysis works with whatever stack the role requires.
How long does the analysis take?
Most submissions are scored within minutes. You get a notification when results are ready.
Is candidate data secure?
MeritDeck only accesses the specific repository a candidate chooses to submit. Code is analysed and scored — it is never stored beyond the assessment period or shared with other clients.
Do candidates know they're being assessed by software?
Candidates know their code will be analysed against the brief requirements. The submission process is transparent about what happens next, and every candidate receives specific feedback on their work.
Be first in when we open the doors
Join the waitlist and we’ll let you know the moment your account is ready.
Join the waitlist →